03 Dec 2010
Introduction
Women are nurturing and vulnerable; they seek commitment in relationships; they gather rather than hunt. Men are callous, competitive and violent.Their motivations are basically different. And Darwinism can make sense of that: in the evolutionary environment women primates make the significant investment in child-bearing, so they take decisions about nurturing more more seriously. This sort of talk used to send feminists screaming to reach for theories of cultural determination. A new breed of feminists thinks that evolutionary psychology is not only OK, but positively liberating: it gives men and women self-knowledge and allows them to plan fulfilling lives better. But there is still a nagging worry: are the differences being exaggerated and used to encourage stereotypes that they do not justify?
Speakers & Speaker Summaries
Diana Fleischman
Psychological researcher
Darwinism is no threat because it shows men and women are different
In terms of scientific averages, men and women can be shown to be different, with gendered strengths and weaknesses. However, at an individual level men and women can be judged on merit, not gender. This is what feminism, as an idea, refers to. Individuals should speak for themselves.
Darwinism doesn’t threaten men and women’s plastic, modern identities
Although evolution has taught us different selection pressures led to gendered behaviours, in a modern environment, where we are not hunting and gathering or communicating face-to-face, our interaction with culture and the environment is plastic and dynamic. Modernity means we are not constrained by evolutionary pressures; that’s why Darwinism does not threaten feminism or the opportunity for equal competition between men and women.
Men and women have very different motivations
Although actual differences between men and women may be small, their intentions, motivations and functions of happiness are very different. It is this which is evolutionarily informed (rather than aptitude itself) and significant for an individual’s overall happiness. Society can gain more by this understanding, and systems can be designed to maximise individuals’ happiness. Gendered stereotypes here can be used positively.
Rachael Panizzo
Research, British Medical Association
Scientific research is used to reinforce gender stereotypes
Although evolution, evolutionary psychology and the study of human behaviour are interesting fields, the practical use of their findings is a threat to feminism. Apart from the pure knowledge gained, research is just used to legitimise negative, sexist stereotypes. Equally, there is proof that negative, gendered, stereotypes become self fulfilling prophecies.
As a society, we tend to focus on differences not similarities
The over-exaggeration of scientific studies into gender differences is a threat to feminism. People have tended to refer to Darwinism to highlight gender differences, but research must not be used like this because men and women are more similar than they are different and the actual differences are very few.
Darwinism is a threat because it distracts from feminism as an ideal
Feminism should not take anything into account which isn’t useful for its cause, or the empowerment of women. The ideals of feminism should not be undermined by the latest scientific facts and figures.
"What to do about Iran?", featuring Daniel Levy, Fawaz Gerges, and Roxane Farmanfarmaian, RGS, 7th June
Buy tickets
One of America's most influential columnists on the decline of America, at the Royal Institution, 13th June 2012
Buy tickets
American neuroscientist David Eagleman on the science of hatred and dehumanisation, RIBA, 24th May 2012
Buy tickets
Copyright 2011 Intelligence 2 Ltd | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Guidelines | Goodies | FAQs