The United Nations is terminally paralysed: The democratic world needs a forum of its own

The United Nations is terminally paralysed: The democratic world needs a forum of its own

22 Jan 2009

The panel discuss the contention that the United Nations is terminally paralysed, and the democratic world needs a forum of its own.

Arguing in favour of the motion are Radek Sikorski, Robert Kagan, and Denis MacShane. Radek Sikorski believes that the work of the UN is essential and that as a body it reflects the variety of worldwide political systems. However, he also believes that democracy should not be taken for granted. Historian and Commentator Robert Kagan discusses the possibility of the formation of an organisation that is complementary to the UN, to avoid deadlocks at Security Councils. He mentions the globalisation of democracy and the need for a forum that addresses this. Labour MP Denis MacShane argues that the UN is a hindrance to the promotion of democracy around the world and that it has failed as an international peace-keeping body.

Arguing against the motion are Shashi Tharoor, Jeremy Greenstock, and Lord Malloch-Brown. Shashi Tharoor argues that the accomplishments of the UN are considerable, and that the UN has proven itself extremely adaptable to changing times. He suggests that the paralysis is in the minds of people who do not see the UN in action. Former ambassador and diplomat Jeremy Greenstock argues that, as an institution, the UN is not paralysed, rather its members are. While admitting certain failures of the UN Greenstock highlights that the UN is a global institution, there to be built on. Finally Lord Malloch-Brown former explains that the existing body of the UN should not be taken for granted, and that democracy does not translate into the backing of human right as national interests prevail.

First vote: 336 For, 251 Against, 214 Don't know

Final vote: 240 For, 500 Against, 78 Don't know

The motion was defeated by 260 votes.