03 Sep 2009
Winston Churchill is often held up as a champion of freedom and a symbol of Britain’s determination to defend the world from the threat of Nazism, but do we see Churchill through rose-tinted glasses? Are we forgetting his authorisation of the RAF’s ‘terror-bombing’ of German cities in World War 2, and his starvation blockade of Germany during the Great War? And what about the military catastrophes he masterminded at Gallipoli (1915) and Norway (1940)? An esteemed panel debate Churchill’s true legacy.
Arguing in favour of the motion are Pat Buchanan, Nigel Knight, and Norman Stone.
Pat Buchanan opens the case for the motion by acknowledging Churchill's role during Britain's 'Finest Hour' in 1940, but goes on to state that for the rest of his career, "no other career of a western statesman was more calamitous for his country and civilisation than that of Winston Spencer Churchill".
Nigel Knight criticises Churchill for his decision to put Britain on the gold standard - a decision which worsened the effects of the Great Depression when it eventually arrived, and his failure to recognise Japan as a major threat to Britain's naval superiority.
Norman Stone decries the 'myth' of Churchill as a dangerous thing, and condemns Churchill's disastrous imperialist attitude, such as trying to salvage the Empire in the east whilst only just hanging on in a European war.
Arguing against the motion are Andrew Roberts, Anthony Beevor, and Professor Richard Overy.
Andrew Roberts begins by praising Churchill for ensuring that the British fleet was ready for action at the start of the Great War. He also warned Britain in the 1930s - at great political cost to himself - of the threat that Adolf Hitler posed, and in his famous 'Iron curtain' speech in 1946, warned the world of the threat that the Soviet Union posed.
Anthony Beevor focuses his argument on World War II, beginning by stating that Churchill was correct to delay D-Day, allowing the American Army to gain experience fighting in the Mediterranean. He also notes that Churchill championed the freedom of the central and eastern European states towards the end of, and after, WWII.
Richard Overy says that Churchill cannot be blamed for all of the things of which he is accused because all of the decisions he made were as part of a committee. But most of all, Overy says, Churchill was a man driven by a love of liberty and a deep-seated hatred of tyranny.
First Vote: 118 For, 1167 Against, 422 Don’t Know
Final Vote: 181 For, 1194 Against, 34 Don’t Know
Professor of International Relations at Bilkent University, Ankara. He was Professor of Modern History at Oxford University from 1984-1997.
Political scientist and economist
Senior advisor to three Presidents and two-time candidate for the Republican presidential nomination
Journalist and broadcaster
Historian
Historian
Historian
"What to do about Iran?", featuring Daniel Levy, Fawaz Gerges, and Roxane Farmanfarmaian, RGS, 7th June
Buy tickets
One of America's most influential columnists on the decline of America, at the Royal Institution, 13th June 2012
Buy tickets
American neuroscientist David Eagleman on the science of hatred and dehumanisation, RIBA, 24th May 2012
Buy tickets
Copyright 2011 Intelligence 2 Ltd | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Guidelines | Goodies | FAQs