You are not signed in Sign in | Contact Us
Main image for the briefing: There is no truth in history

There is no truth in history

Throughout history, the likes of George Orwell and Michel Foucault have argued, truth has been nothing more than the fragile result of the struggles between competing groups, with the winners able to use their political power to suppress their enemies' point of view.

As Napoleon once said, "History is a set of lies agreed upon." Some historians deny there is such a thing as historical truth at all and argue that history tells us more about the people who write it than about the past they purport to describe.

Others counter that, however much eye-witness accounts might differ, historians have elaborated a whole battery of sophisticated methods of checking the evidence and dealing with the gaps and partialities of their sources. They say that history deals with facts, not fiction.

Share this debate

  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • Digg
  • NewsVine
  • Google
  • LinkedIn

Iran debate

"What to do about Iran?", featuring Daniel Levy, Fawaz Gerges, and Roxane Farmanfarmaian, RGS, 7th June

Buy tickets

Thomas Friedman

One of America's most influential columnists on the decline of America, at the Royal Institution, 13th June 2012

Buy tickets

Eagleman talk

American neuroscientist David Eagleman on the science of hatred and dehumanisation, RIBA, 24th May 2012

Buy tickets

IQ² GLOBAL

USA

Asia

Australia

Ukraine

Greece



Copyright 2011 Intelligence 2 Ltd | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Guidelines | Goodies | FAQs