Carbon capture and storage is the nascent technology which intends to trap the CO2 previously emitted by power stations and pipe it deep into the bowels of the earth. For its supporters, it is our last, best chance to avert the looming catastrophe of global warming. They say that the earth has room to safely store 65 years worth of CO2 emissions, that oil companies have been burying the gas for years, and that the price of CCS – an estimated £100 per household per year – is not much to pay for saving the world.
But not everybody agrees, and others maintain that the energy industry is taking our governments for a ride. The critics insist that CCS uses more and more fossil fuels, that we should be concentrating on renewable energy sources instead, and that there’s no guarantee that the storage technology will even work. Then there are the risks – can we really be sure that the underground CO2 will never leak?
Our Debate of the Day, a For and Against analysis of the week's most hotly disputed public issue, will soon be part of Intelligence Squared's membership package. For continuing access to these, and our Controversies, become a member here.
Season tickets are £100 each and include one ticket and a glass of wine for all five debates in our autumn 2010 series
Buy tickets
Buy tickets for 'The Middle East peace process is a charade' on September 21, featuring Edward Luttwak and Martin Indyk
Buy tickets
See all of the latest IQ² content on one page, including written debates, live debates, and talks from our partners
See what's new
Former president of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf will talk to Sir Christopher Meyer at this IQ² World Leaders event on September 29
Buy ticketsThis week, The Magazine brings you both sides of the story on WikiLeaks and the pros and cons of government stimulus spending
See the magazine
Copyright 2010 Intelligence 2 Ltd | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Guidelines | Goodies